Catholics are regularly heard parroting the lie that the Catholic Church offered us the Bible. Is this true?

BIBLE CATHOLIC? the books of the bible were completed 300-400 yrs prior to the catholic church was formed. JEWISH males wrote the holy bible as the divine Spirit influenced them – 2 Timothy 3:16; 2 Peter 1:20-21.

You are watching: Did the catholic church give us the bible

Did we gain the bible from the catholic church?

IF THE holy bible IS A CATHOLIC BOOK, THEN: Why does that condemn clerical dress? (Matt. 23:5-6). Why does that teach against the adoration of Mary? (Luke 11:27-28). Why go it display that all Christians are priests? (1 Pet. 2:5,9). Why does it condemn the observance of one-of-a-kind days? (Gal. 4:9-11). Why does that forbid us to address spiritual leaders together “father”? (Matt. 23:9).

Also, IF THE holy bible IS A CATHOLIC BOOK, THEN: Why does the bible teach the Christ is the only foundation and not the apostle Peter? (1 Cor. 3:11). Why walk it resolve only God Himself as the “Holy Father”? (John 17:11). Why does the teach the there is one mediator rather of many? (1 Tim. 2:5). Why is it completely silent around infant baptism, indulgences, purgatory, confession to priests, the rosary, the mass, and many various other heresies perpetrated through the Catholic Church?

IF THE holy bible IS A CATHOLIC BOOK, THEN: Why go the holy bible teach the all Christians are saints? (1 Cor. 1:2). Why does that condemn the making and adoration that images? (Ex. 20:4-5). Why does it teach that baptism is immersion rather of pouring? (Col. 2:12).

If the scriptures is catholic, why then did the Pope put the holy bible on the table of contents of forbidden publications in the 12th century?

Other than whereby the new Testament the the scriptures tells united state that every Christians are saints and also priests, wherein does the NT call for a priesthood of robe-wearing pharisees? Chapters and also verses please?

By David Daniels

“The scriptures came with the Catholic Church.”

Today this statement is universally embraced both in the church world and in secular history. Writer Gail Riplinger, in her brand-new book “In Awe of her Word”, spends number of hundred pages proving that this is wrong.

Even a casual look at the proof discloses that there were two streams the scripture the flowed indigenous apostolic times. Most history books follow just one stream the flows from Jerusalem down through Alexandria, Egypt and also up right into Rome.

Along the method the stream came to be polluted v heretical teachings. The corruption Vaticanus and also Sinaiticus manuscripts are commodities of that stream. The scriptures produced from these manuscripts is the scriptures that the Vatican cases to have provided the world. These carry out the communication for all the modern Bible versions.

But once this polluted present of scripture come in Rome, it came to be mired in the political bog the what we now speak to Roman Catholicism. For over a thousands years, superstition, ignorance and also organized corruption locked this scriptures away indigenous the typical man.

But Riplinger’s study uncovers an additional stream that flows increase from Jerusalem with Antioch in Syria whereby the practical worker were an initial called Christians. (See action 11:26.) Citing thousands of passages from records largely ignored through historians, she proves the a pure version of the scriptures was agreed upon as at an early stage as 100 ad and copies began to follow the trade routes north and west as missionaries took up the an excellent commission.

Rome did everything within her strength to stamp out the christians who had actually these pure Scriptures. Throughout the dark eras the harlot church melted every copy she can get her hands on. But God had actually promised to keep His Words.

When the to press press came to be available, guys like Wycliffe and also Zwinglie took the manuscripts from that stream and translated them right into the typical languages. The ignorance the God’s Word was broken. The result was the improvement that not correct the bondage that the popes.

Riplinger pieces with each other scraps of background proving the visibility of a Gothic bible as at an early stage as 350 advertisement and the text virtually exactly matches the textus receptus that created the basis because that the KJV. Studies disclose that it was a word-for-word, literal equivalence translation native the Antioch stream of Greek scriptures.

Riplinger traces this north stream of bible from the Goths, through the Visigoths, Anglo-Saxons, Old English, right into the time of Wycliffe and also on come King James.

At the same time, Riplinger provides dozens the charts of details scriptures whereby the original Gothic variation matches the KJV while the very same verses are either lacking or different in definition in the modern versions based on the other, Alexandrian/ roman inn Catholic, currently of manuscripts.

Riplinger’s proof is powerful, beforehand testimony to the purity that the KJV. The sterling commitment of the north stream of manuscripts was standing in stark contrast to the muddled confusion uncovered in the southern, Alexandrian/ Vatican manuscripts.

It is technically true that the Catholic Church provided us a Bible. But it is a Bible based on flawed manuscripts complete of contradictions and also inconsistencies. The confusion in the church today brought about by the gaggle of versions was birthed by an effort to “fix” the “archaic” language that the KJV. However that solve was dipped indigenous the southerly stream of corruption manuscripts. The bible that was “given” by the roman inn Catholic Church is a counterfeit Bible, designed come sideline and eventually remove God’s preserved Words in the King James Bible.

See more: The Reward-To-Volatility Ratio Is Given By _________., Chapter 5 Flashcards

Riplinger’s new book is a weighty volume yet provides much more overwhelming proof how God went around preserving His words in the KJV. It gift damning testimony against the pope’s case that God’s maintained Words came with the Vatican institution identified in Revelation together the prostitute church.